Forum Forum Home Bandit’s Posts Today’s Posts

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

*if he had pushed repeat bet like he said then it wouldn’t have worked and he would have had enough time to place another bet rather than betting 250 it putting all the chips down and then when betting ends it rejects the bet becuase technically there isn’t enough in the balance despite it showing there is.

[Li Lifeslots WANTED $58 Outlaw]

I’ll happily lick Bandit’s arse for another video on Sunday ?

[Seedy WANTED $1,243 Sheriff]

Dynamik23 wrote:

Let’s see if I understand this. VS take a percentage of a win and and save it for you and give it back as a weekend booster. Which in itself is wank imo. You can opt out which is fair but OP didn’t read T&C’s so is pissed off. (Unlucky) BUT if his balance says 250 and he bet 250 and then bet is rejected because £1.25 is being saved for his weekend booster why does it show in his real time balance? This for sure should not be the case and mainly for this exact reason. If his balance had shown the correct amount it would have not accepted the bet and he could have made another bet. Win or lose it doesn’t matter, it’s the principle.

It only take 0.5% of any profit so no so if you bet 250 that’s your bet the booster comes out of any winnings.

[BS BSK1 WANTED $48 Outlaw]

There are some special people on this site ???

[SweFjorod WANTED $10 Outlaw]

Yes, Video slots take a small % from when you win and add it to you weekend booster, you can disable that part tho and you won’t get a weekend booster.

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $697 Outlaw]

SweFjorod wrote:

Yes, Video slots take a small % from when you win and add it to you weekend booster, you can disable that part tho and you won’t get a weekend booster.

I like the weekend booster …. makes me feel special … like it’s Christmas every week

[Bamboozler WANTED $23 Outlaw]

So, basically you allow VS to legitimately withold a small portion of your winnings until a weekend with seemingly no tangible benefit.

Seems like a relatively pointless thing to do and should be something that the players should be required to opt in to rather than being required to read all the conditions in order to understand the need to opt out.

The opening poster has received criticism for not reading the T&C’s and that is entirely valid. Clearly it is no-one’s fault but his and to seek to blame others for his laziness is ridiculous.

The casinos play on the laziness of customers to sneakily reduce RTP’s, charge withdrawal fees and restrict payouts of legitimate winnings and that’s part of their business model.

How many of you though would be furious if, as I understand it, you had placed a bet and it won from funds seemingly readily available and showing in your balance to therafter have the bet voided? VS are responsible for this stupid anomoly that could easily catch anyone out . Moreover, would the bet have been accepted if the bet had been lost? The only way to know would be to read and undersand the T&C’s

[Dr DrSnow WANTED $6 Outlaw]

Disregarding all the guff above.

I don’t like the tactics of the WB on Videoslots or on Rizk and it’s “wheel of Rizk” (the other day my son, quite randomly, shouted “Welcome to the Wheel of Rizk, I was mortified) anyway….these two sites are trying to make sure you come back at a later point to hopefully deposit and get you in the cycle.  Yeah, yeah, I know you don’t HAVE to come back, but people do.

In my mind this is like McDonald’s saying “hope you enjoyed your meal, if you comeback next Friday I’ll give you a free milkshake and if you have another meal, you can have a free milkshake after that” and so on.  They wouldn’t be able to get away with that.

It’s shady.

[Mo MoonHook WANTED $30 Outlaw]

People stating what happens on some of these sites is nothing to do with The Bandit I find a little unfair.  The Bandit isn’t just ‘playing on the site’ he’s advertising for you to play on the site also.  I’m not saying the issue in this thread has any grounds of being unfair, but I don’t think you can advertise anything you want and not expect to not have criticism if there is a serious issue.

 

For example, if The Bandit is playing on a site and say’s “Oh if you fancy playing on this site like I am, sign up on the link below”.  You then join the site and it’s a shady website where they block your withdrawals. Should none of the responsibility be with the Bandit for playing on it and providing a sign up link?

I’m not saying the Bandit has done this, I’m saying you do hold some of the responsibility of what you’re peddling.

 

Moonhook

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $697 Outlaw]

Bamboozler wrote:

How many of you though would be furious if, as I understand it, you had placed a bet and it won from funds seemingly readily available and showing in your balance to therafter have the bet voided?

Your kind of missing the point of some of the replies, the op said he had to deposit more to cover the final bet, which means although vs do take a % of a win, he hadn’t  won before his final bet for that to be the case, so when he deposited say 200, 200 would be there in his account with remaining balance,

the game probably glitched, or he missed placed the price Of a chip, or many unfair things, but the % Is taken from wins, and as he hadn’t won in the last game, what he had left  and what he deposited would be there as a combined total, when I read it first I imagined that he’d missed priced  the amount he needed in deposit for the bet and that’s why the bet didn’t go through …..but who knows ..

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $697 Outlaw]

MoonHook wrote:

People stating what happens on some of these sites is nothing to do with The Bandit I find a little unfair.  The Bandit isn’t just ‘playing on the site’ he’s advertising for you to play on the site also.  I’m not saying the issue in this thread has any grounds of being unfair, but I don’t think you can advertise anything you want and not expect to not have criticism if there is a serious issue.

 

For example, if The Bandit is playing on a site and say’s “Oh if you fancy playing on this site like I am, sign up on the link below”.  You then join the site and it’s a shady website where they block your withdrawals. Should none of the responsibility be with the Bandit for playing on it and providing a sign up link?

I’m not saying the Bandit has done this, I’m saying you do hold some of the responsibility of what you’re peddling.

 

Moonhook

I think it goes with out saying that a streamer/ or slotter would be frowned upon for suggesting wank sites, So we should all be on you tube throwing shade at them, but bandit does use top sites ( even tho there’s a slight nudge against vs on this forum at the mo) all his sites were appropriate and registered…if something breaks internally at the casino then there is only so much bandit can do/ predict,  If vs blocked a transaction is that something he needs to own ? Or if somebodies booted of the casino site ?….. there’s only so much I think you can expect from a streamer, is the site legit ? And is it regulated? And everything is up to scratch ? If yes,  then past that I can’t see how it would fall On Streamers unless they answer no to all the above…

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Fuck sake made a post but was signed out. Sorry @seedy.

[Dynamik23 WANTED $82 Outlaw]

Scrolling through Twitter and I saw bandit say @seedy was wrong about the 0.5% thing being your own money. Then I watched his unlisted video while watching some enthralling pacman. Seems like bandit maybe doesn’t know that it’s actually part of your winnings and not a rakeback kind of scheme. It’s all bloody confusing imo. Don’t like VS due to the RTP thing but I understood why people played as they do have the weekend booster and they do have the wheel spin things but I feel like now the weekend booster is imo a pile of wank then what does it have going for it? I admit the layout and ease of use was something I liked but can’t think of much else that I couldnt get at another casino with higher RTP. Please inform me if I’m wrong on bandits knowledge of the 0.5% thing.

[Li Lifeslots WANTED $58 Outlaw]

This whole weekend booster is fucked up because I don’t think even the bandit has got this right. Just watches and listened very carefully to his video on Twitter. ( 100% love The Bandit and this is no way shape or form a dig at you 🙂 ).

 

so listening you said that every £40 spin resulted in 24p boost to your weekend vault and I know I’ve only ever got anything when I win.

Take this down to human level I had a spin on reelking @£4 which should then yield a weekend booster balance of 2.4p or expressed as 0.024. 2 spins should give 0.048.

Nope, zip all. Nothing has gone onto it. Yet earlier I had a small win and there was 40p in there.

clearly says it’s 0.5% of any winnings saved up in a vault for you.

 

I give up !

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $697 Outlaw]

Lifeslots wrote:

This whole weekend booster is fucked up because I don’t think even the bandit has got this right. Just watches and listened very carefully to his video on Twitter. ( 100% love The Bandit and this is no way shape or form a dig at you ).

 

so listening you said that every £40 spin resulted in 24p boost to your weekend vault and I know I’ve only ever got anything when I win.

Take this down to human level I had a spin on reelking @£4 which should then yield a weekend booster balance of 2.4p or expressed as 0.024. 2 spins should give 0.048.

Nope, zip all. Nothing has gone onto it. Yet earlier I had a small win and there was 40p in there.

clearly says it’s 0.5% of any winnings saved up in a vault for you.

 

I give up !

I’m pretty sure not all games are included in the weekend booster ??????? @xbob????

[Author]

Posts