Forum Forum Home Bandit’s Posts Today’s Posts

[Pu Purple_Ron WANTED $2 Outlaw]

Hi Guys

HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE!

looking for some opinions on this bonus term.

 

I have recently played at a website I have always avoided like the plague  due to its reputation, but I thought I would do a small deposit as the welcome offer was quite good.

 

I managed to hit Cold Mode on Happy Holidays, and it paid something like 900x, so beating the wagering requirement became a breeze

Once completed wagering, I then played a bit of Blackjack/Roulette and got my balance up to a nice Withdrawal/ Profit.

I always check the bonus terms for restricted games, max bet etc, and <span style=”text-decoration: underline;”>I’m 100% a never played any restricted game whilst wagering or bet above the max stake</span>

 

<span style=”text-decoration: underline;”>I did however makes larger bets, once the wagering was completed and  my winnings was converted into real money.</span>

 

Now I am waiting for my withdrawal to process, I’ve just re-read one of the bonus terms and its got me scared.

This is the bonus term;

‘Unless prior agreement is made between the player and the casino, in the case that bonus bets are higher than the maximum acceptable amount, the casino reserves the right to invalidate all bonus bets for the bonus in question and thus any winnings derived from the bonus. Should the bonuses’ wagering requirements have been met and wagering continued using real money, winnings will still be invalidated as the winnings would have originated from the turnover of bonus funds.’

 

how do you guys interpret this term

My concern is that after completing wagering, I went onto do a big bets of roulette, above the max bet when you have bonus funds.

Do you guys read this, as I have broken the terms?

I am a bit taken back by this term, as I’ve always assumed on any casino, <span style=”text-decoration: underline;”>once your winnings are wagered</span>…you can do what you like with them & bet higher than the max stake

 

Any feedback greatly appreciated.

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $697 Outlaw]

Purple_Ron wrote:

in the case that bonus bets are higher than the maximum acceptable amount, the casino reserves the right to invalidate all bonus bets for the bonus in question and thus any winnings derived from the bonus

Right not an expert, but it’s talking about bets within the wagering requirements…. once you’ve passed that and the bonus vanishes into cash… you can do what you like ..you went big after finishing the requirements, as long as you did it afterwards you weren’t using “bonus money” so it doesn’t count….how I’d see it anyway

[Xbobmad WANTED $729 Outlaw]

Usually if someone avoids like the plague they don’t go for a small dose ?

If it’s a genuine casino I can’t see there being a problem with the specific terms you’ve copy pasted.

[Kelvie WANTED $45 Outlaw]

Why did you play on a webiste you avoid? That’s never going to end well, usless it’s only because you don’t like that certain casino and not due to it being dodgie. That being said, it does sound like what you think. But Not fair. Once you have converted bonus funds you should be able to bet what you like.

[Seyahkram1977 WANTED $697 Outlaw]

Xbobmad wrote:

Usually if someone avoids like the plague they don’t go for a small dose

If it’s a genuine casino I can’t see there being a problem with the specific terms you’ve copy pasted.

Ahhh we all remember that time there was a dodgy car sales man, We’d never buy from him …because he was dodgy …. but the cars were half price …. wellllllllllll We couldn’t say no……what could go wrong …

[Author]

Posts