No no I fully agree that everything has a reason, regardless of that being understandable, in any way. But of course the meaning of random and it’s claimed use are not exactly the same. I know of one poker place that claimed to have a double shuffle (online) which had me wondering how useless the first must have been, to require a second and why not a third to make it 150% random, assuming the % value of each shuffle lol
I guess it leaves the only random thing being if they are really as random as possible and given eg a 91% rtp setting, can random really be stated ? I think not. But then I think of random letter picking from one stack of the alphabet, eventually the right letter has to come out but with deck changes and so on…. of course true random means massive ups and downs at times and only a house edge to give it true bias.
I dunno… really random ? nah.