Profile : JohnoG

Understand that, but if it’s untestable, how do UKGC monitor it?

Pragmatic is the provider for wild wild riches. Take a look at how Big Bass has been playing now compared to 3 weeks ago. Me and wifey have literally smashed this game as always hitting bonus and more often than not you get to level 2 and 3. Recently not getting passed first level, and this week we have started getting bonuses where fisherman doesn’t show up at all – 100% convinced they have changed this game!!!

Seyahkram1977 wrote:

Dynamik23 wrote:

If it wasnt double chance then they would not have been able to licence the game. Both casino and game provider would get fucked so hard, especially in the UK. People trying to test it will never be able to accurately do so. They would need to test playing millions and millions of spins to get a big enough sample where variance isn’t playing a part.

100% this,  dynamik spot on, with variance, blind luck and “being on  the right game at the right time” you could never test the theory in 100-200 spins, and comparing your play to your wife’s game is just totally pointless as each spin is random and “unique” and to test it you both need to be On the same track to recognise any difference bumps ( which mathematically can’t happen ) your wife could have bonuses 5 times in 100 spins and nothing then for 500, you might not bonus in the first 100 but then get two or three in the next 500…….. it’s just un testable….but if it didn’t work or have an effect it couldn’t be used as it would be a scam and ( at least )  Ukgc would be smashing on it.

but slots are about how you feel, if you feel strongly one way then go that way.

Historically

Bonanza and Gonzo – and when they do bonus never win big.

Lately – jammin and chocolates both tilting me.

Might be one for the bandit challenge – land a monster ?