Profile : Haz40

Rbreen91 wrote:

Haz40 wrote:

jon scholes wrote:

Haz40 wrote:

Rbreen made a joke with his reply well so did i. No one agreed with the thread so they had a laugh and made a joke about derby fans including myself not to mention the angry birds post. It’s what we do. Some threads if we think their worth contributing to and agree we will but if people don’t agree they may take the piss a little and have a joke and a laugh. Just harmless banter.

You know what most ppl do if they don’t think a topic is worthy of a reply….ignore it…not hijack it…and start throwing jb allegations against the OP.

Ignore it and move on to a topic you do consider more worthy of discussion.

To see the fucking dam right aggressive behaviours of some members here is a disgrace.

Were not most people though

Thank fuck for that eh, Haz?

Unique ?

jon scholes wrote:

Haz40 wrote:

Rbreen made a joke with his reply well so did i. No one agreed with the thread so they had a laugh and made a joke about derby fans including myself not to mention the angry birds post. It’s what we do. Some threads if we think their worth contributing to and agree we will but if people don’t agree they may take the piss a little and have a joke and a laugh. Just harmless banter.

You know what most ppl do if they don’t think a topic is worthy of a reply….ignore it…not hijack it…and start throwing jb allegations against the OP.

Ignore it and move on to a topic you do consider more worthy of discussion.

To see the fucking dam right aggressive behaviours of some members here is a disgrace.

Were not most people though ?

jon scholes wrote:

Rbreen91 wrote:

Good luck trying to bully, intimidate or deliver a meaningful insult my way… it’s not working

You’re not even good at it, everyone is just laughing at your petulance.

And everybody is laughing at your input to a perfectly reasonable issue raised…..lets just go back to your opening post on my thread.

7th August 2019 at 6:10 pm Reply with Quote | Reply | Report
Rb
Rbreen91
WANTED $296
Outlaw

Don’t see any issue with it. Who the fuck is gonna watch Derby anyway?

 

Wow outstanding contribution Rbreen…thanks for your engaging reply

Sorry to say we weren’t laughing at rbreen’s reply

jon scholes wrote:

Haz40 wrote:

I think tbh jon if your thread had any substance you would of got a more welcoming response from our regulars. Malkychamp has provided the stats and most on here including myself feel the issue with underage gambling is more about loot boxes lottery scratch cards betting with friends seaside arcades and not online casinos. The stats provided has proved that so I’m afraid you should take that.

That’s because this is a new Haz..No high profile footballer has ever worn a shirt related to his/her affiliation with a gambing casino. wow just wow. Times are changing from crown paints and walkers crips, my question asking if you thought it was Moral is more the underlying issue….but don’t worry im not here to talk about that subject. Im here to insult ppl and belittle them like a majority of the regular posters here.

Snooker players and darts are all sponsored by betting firms and casino sites. Well just about all. This is nothing new to us.

I think tbh jon if your thread had any substance you would of got a more welcoming response from our regulars. Malkychamp has provided the stats and most on here including myself feel the issue with underage gambling is more about loot boxes lottery scratch cards betting with friends seaside arcades and not online casinos. The stats provided has proved that so I’m afraid you should take that.

Biohazard wrote:

I’ve literally been waiting for this to make a thread to congratulate him, and you beat me to it!

+1 vote for removing all of Haz’ likes.

Aw thanks mate. ??