Profile : Tricky0212

Why didn’t you play on one of your normal sites ? Presumably because you’re on Gamstop ?

Even if you were drunk, I find it hard to believe you were able enough to find and sign up to a brand new casino and deposit  but weren’t able to notice “backinamo.uk” was very different to this, a website that you’re used to and come on fairly often.

I think the £3.50 charges are the least of your problems, max bank charges will get capped at like £80 anyway. Find yourself some work, get on Gamstop (although I suspect you already are) and don’t sign up to any more dodgy sites.

Check the sites terms, it’s not uncommon for it to state if you use someone else card they are entitled to assume you have permission of the card holder. I personally think you will be ok but they may block the account or at least stop you using that card – that’s what pokerstars and party poker do but they do pay out in this situation.

People would probably pay more attention if you actually tipped these winners before the race and not just say you got a winner afterwards.

Otherwise all we see is you tipped 2 horses today.

1 Winner at 2/5 so £1 returns £1.40

1 loser so £1 returns 0.

In total I would be 60p down today, but then you mention these other winners that you never said anything about before.

I appreciate you’re learning but if you’re going to start “tipping” on a forum it’s important to only inform people of the results of the horses you tipped and not other random bets you did that you never mentioned before.

Mitros On Fire wrote:

moonspamster wrote:

lucky 15 idea take these 3 and add another horse with decent form. Must be 4 selections from different races.

I do 50p with 15 bets each way so you have 30 bets consisting of doubles singles amd trebles etc

£15 bet in total

State Crown 3-1 race 5

First Winter 5-6 race 6

Casting Vote 5-6 race 7

Buicks first horse Zamani already won

 

 

You back odds on shots in E/W lucky 15’s???

Good shout with Stanford.

Yes, that is really bad strategy.

even the 4 you picked today – 3 winners and 1 loser but in an EW lucky 15 you would spend £15 but only return £13.90 so you actually lose money for picking 3/4 winners.

Try doing bigger stake doubles trebles etc on such selections and definitely no EW on horses that are odds on.

good luck though ?

It really doesn’t matter what we think to be honest. I’m a lawyer and could cite so many things they do wrong, but they are a Curacao casino and aren’t supposed to accept U.K. players anyway.

They are not regulated under our laws, and you would have 0 hope of seeing the money I’m afraid.

Your “friend” is probably on Gamstop which is why he is using these dodgy casinos so the best advice you can give him is to just not use them as it will always end in disappointment – he will either lose, or win and not be able to collect.

Im not even taking sides, as don’t agree with the way things are promoted either, but your statement that “I didn’t read the terms because no one does” is not true and is the exact cause of your issue. As another member has posted above there is clearly and “opt out” of that particular promotion and so it’s squarely on your to decide if that promotion is good value or not in your eyes.

There is no way you can accuse anyone else for being responsible, as why would bandit waste his time at the start of each video explaining all the latest promotions of terms of a particular site – that’s not what he’s here to do, that’s on you.

I gather English isn’t your first language from the poorly constructed explanations which actually still aren’t entirely clear but the concept remains the same.

Im a lawyer and look at contracts/terms/procedures etc all day long and I would confidently say there is a 0% chance of any refund or positive response to the complaint. As mentioned above they have not strictly speaking done anything wrong and have operated within their required parameters – I appreciate your friend probably thinks they should have acted more quickly but there needs to be a balance between the cost of them live monitoring players (I.e constantly) and their duty to act.

Take potholes as a good example – the council have to periodically check to maintain a reasonable standard – they are not liable for every pothole as some may form between inspections and it would too burdensome for them to constantly be checking the roads on a daily basis so a balance has to be struck.

Aside from the legal standpoint there is then the moral standpoint that he does not actually deserve the money back as there has been no injustice – as others have said it would open up the casinos to a huge amount of unknown liability and would be grossly unfair to them. I would probably suggest for this reason alone the complaint would be rejected.