tyti1000 wrote:
Random.shit almost half of the numbers were 3K something .
TheBandit wrote:
This kind of post can be potentially damaging for me you know โ like some folk may read it and think ah yeah, he must have fixed that draw. When you post something along these lines you kind of have to make sure it is correct before hitting that submit button, interestingly, you arenโt the only person to say this but the proof is right there in the video, so thereโs no reason for you to be incorrect right? Well, out of 80 teams picked, 80 numbers, there were 20 numbers that came from the 3,000โs. Does that surprise you? I canโt quite get my head round how people thought it was 3,000 number heavy but the fact of the matter is, it wasnโt.
I know its real. Its not ur fault, just saying about Random.org, taking the piss sometimes. I know everyone is using it. Dont worry probably just frustation, I never get lucky. Sorry for the post. ๐