I also would like to say that if said casinos or people who say its not a lie, gave me unrefutable evidence that they dont rig certain games. I would then lay down my battered sword and say well done sir, you win.
But the problem is…no one HAS given me solid unrefutable facts or evidence that they dont rig certain games. So i will carry on believing what i think is the most obvious to me.
Simple question; when someone is accused of a crime, is it on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt they are guilty, or is it on the accused to provide irrefutable proof they are innocent?